Research Paper Proposal – Draft #1

Title: Exploring the Role of Empathy in Mitigating Negative Bias towards AI Art: A Comparative Study of Humanoid Robots and Algorithmic Text-to-Image Generation

Abstract:

This research proposal aims to investigate the role of empathy in mitigating the negative bias against AI art, specifically comparing the potential of humanoid robots in eliciting empathy as opposed to simple algorithmic text-to-image generation. The proposal seeks to explore whether art created by humanoid robots is preferable to art created by Ai text to image generation. By examining the psychological factors influencing art reception and empathy, the study seeks to examine whether or not the embodiment of human-like qualities in humanoid robots can enhance emotional connections, reduce negative bias, and foster a deeper appreciation of AI-generated art.

Keywords:

Humanoid robots, AI-generated art, Empathy, Negative bias, Art perception, Emotional connection, Robotic creativity, Human-robot interaction, Art appreciation, Algorithmic art, Emotional engagement, Bias mitigation, Human-like qualities, AI art evaluation, Artistic expression, Aesthetic appeal, Perception of authenticity, Emotional response, Human-machine collaboration, Ethical considerations

1. Introduction:
   

   Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed various domains, including the realm of art. Through sophisticated algorithms, AI systems can now generate art autonomously, blurring the boundaries between human and machine creativity. However, AI-generated art often faces skepticism and negative bias due to the perceived absence of human emotional depth and subjective experience. To address this challenge, researchers have explored the potential of empathy in fostering a deeper connection between viewers and AI art. Moreover, the emergence of humanoid robots as creative agents provides a captivating avenue for investigating whether their human-like appearance and interactive capabilities can elicit empathy and bridge the gap between AI-generated art and human perception.

   This research proposal aims to examine whether or not there is a role for humanoid robots in mitigating the impact of negative bias towards AI art through the lens of empathy. By investigating the potential of humanoid robots as artistic creators, I seek to explore whether their human-like qualities and interactive abilities can enhance emotional connection, foster empathy, and shape viewer perceptions of AI-generated artworks. This study will contribute to our understanding of how empathy influences art appreciation, the acceptance of AI-generated art, and the potential of humanoid robots to serve as mediators in this context.
2. 1.1 Background:
   

   The rapid advancement of AI and machine learning techniques has led to the development of sophisticated algorithms capable of creating art. AI-generated art encompasses various forms, including visual art, music, and literature, and has garnered significant attention in the art world. However, the reception of AI art has been met with mixed reviews. While some appreciate the novelty and technical prowess of AI-generated artworks, others express skepticism and critique the perceived lack of human emotional expression and intention behind the creations.

   Negative bias towards AI-generated art stems from the fundamental belief that art is deeply connected to human experiences, emotions, and subjectivity. Viewers often seek a personal connection and emotional resonance when engaging with art, attributes traditionally associated with human artists. Consequently, the absence of a human creator in the AI art-making process can lead to skepticism and a perceived lack of authenticity.

   In recent years, researchers have explored the role of empathy in influencing art perception and appreciation. Empathy, defined as the ability to understand and share the feelings of others, has been shown to play a crucial role in creating emotional connections between viewers and artworks. By empathising with the artist’s intentions, emotions, and context, viewers can develop a deeper appreciation and understanding of the art.

   The use of humanoid robots as artistic agents introduces a fascinating dimension to the study of AI-generated art and empathy. Humanoid robots possess physical attributes that resemble humans, enabling them to engage with viewers in a more relatable and familiar manner. Moreover, their interactive capabilities and expressive features provide opportunities for emotional engagement and empathetic responses. By investigating the potential of humanoid robots in eliciting empathy and mitigating negative bias towards AI art, this research aims to determine whether humanoid robotic art seen through a lens of empathy is viewed as preferable to simple text to image algorithmic art.

   In this research proposal, I aim to investigate how empathy for a humanoid robot can be leveraged to reduce negative bias towards AI art, specifically by comparing the potential of humanoid robots to elicit empathy versus simple algorithmic text-to-image art generation. Humanoid robots, with their embodiment of human-like qualities, have the potential to establish a more relatable and emotionally engaging connection with human audiences. Algorithmic text-to-image generation, on the other hand, presents a different approach to AI art creation, relying solely on computational algorithms and prompts.

   To understand the implications of empathy and embodiment in the reception of AI art, I will draw upon relevant literature from various fields, including psychology, art theory, and human-computer interaction. By examining the psychological factors influencing art reception and empathy, as well as exploring the unique characteristics of humanoid robots, I aim to shed light on how empathy can be cultivated towards AI-generated art and whether humanoid robots have an advantage over algorithmic text-to-image generation in this context.

    

3. A Comparative Study – Humanoid Robotic Art Versus Text to Image Art
   As a starting point I intend to compare audience responses to the work of Ai Da and Sophie (well known humanoid robots engaged in creating art), to well known text to image and GAN (non humanoid robotic) art including from the top left working clockwise:
   Top left: “Memories of Passersby I” by Mario Klingemann

   Top right: “Portrait of Edmond de Belamy” by the art collective Obvious. It was created using a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), which is an algorithmic model. The artwork was sold as an NFT at a Christie’s auction in 2018, fetching a price of $432,500.

   Bottom right: A Loab variation created by Twitter user @supercomposite

   Bottom Left: Ai-Da and Sophia art creating humanoid robots

    

   Ai-Da and Sophia Versus GANs and text to image Art

    

   Through this research I aim to:

4. Provide an overview of the increasing presence of AI in the art domain, focusing on both algorithmic text-to-image generation and humanoid robots engaged in art creation. Highlight the challenges faced by AI-generated art in terms of negative bias and the potential role of empathy in addressing these challenges.
   1.2 Problem Statement:
5. Identify the problem of negative bias towards AI art and the need to explore the potential of empathy as a means to mitigate this bias. Present the hypothesis that humanoid robots, with their embodiment of human-like qualities, have the potential to elicit empathy more effectively compared to algorithmic text-to-image generation.
   1.3 Objectives:
6. Outline the objectives of the research proposal, including investigating the role of empathy in reducing negative bias towards AI art, comparing the emotional connection to art created by humanoid robots versus algorithmic text-to-image art, and examining the potential advantages of humanoid robots in eliciting empathy.
7. Literature Review
8. 2.1 Empathy in Art Reception:
9. Review existing literature on the role of empathy in art reception, exploring how empathic responses can enhance emotional engagement, aesthetic appreciation, and understanding of art. Discuss studies that examine the relationship between empathy and the perception of human-like qualities in art.
   2.2 Negative Bias towards AI Art:
10. Examine the literature on the negative bias against AI art, discussing the factors contributing to this bias, such as concerns about authenticity, emotional depth, and the perceived lack of human involvement. Explore the potential of empathy in addressing these biases and fostering acceptance of AI-generated art.
    2.3 Humanoid Robots in Art Creation:
11. Review literature on humanoid robots engaged in art creation, focusing on their ability to evoke empathy and emotional responses. Discuss studies that investigate the impact of human-like features, gestures, and expressions in humanoid robots on the perception and reception of their artwork.
12. Methodology
13. 3.1 Research Design:
14. Describe the research design, which may include a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Explain the selection of participants, data collection techniques, and any ethical considerations.
    3.2 Data Collection:
15. Detail the process of data collection, which may involve surveys, interviews, or observational studies. Discuss the variables examined, such as empathy levels, emotional responses, aesthetic appreciation, and perceived authenticity of art created by humanoid robots versus algorithmic text-to-image art.
    3.3 Data Analysis:
16. Explain the chosen data analysis methods, such as thematic analysis or statistical analysis, to derive meaningful insights from the collected data.
17. Implications and Significance
18. Discuss the potential implications and significance of the research proposal, including the possible contributions to the fields of AI art, human-computer interaction, and art appreciation. Highlight the potential impact of the findings on promoting empathy, reducing negative bias, and enhancing the acceptance of AI-generated art.
19. Conclusion
20. Summarise the research proposal, reiterating the importance of investigating empathy in mitigating negative bias towards AI art. Emphasise the potential of humanoid robots in eliciting empathy and discuss the potential benefits of this approach over algorithmic text-to-image generation.

In short – Do humans prefer art created by humanoid robots as opposed to simple Ai text to image generated art?

Bibliography

A dog’s inner life: what a robot pet taught me about consciousness (no date) the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/aug/10/dogs-inner-life-what-robot-pet-taught-me-about-consciousness-artificial-intelligence.

Ai-Da (no date) Ai-Da. Available at: https://www.ai-darobot.com/.

Art by Sophia the Robot – Hanson Robotics (no date) Hanson Robotics. Available at: https://www.hansonrobotics.com/art-by-sophia-the-robot/.

‘artandai.pdf’ (no date). Available at: https://ars.electronica.art/newdigitaldeal/files/2021/08/artandai.pdf.

Artificial Intelligence and the Art of Mario Klingemann (no date) Sothebys.com. Available at: https://www.sothebys.com/en/articles/artificial-intelligence-and-the-art-of-mario-klingemann.

Audry, S. and Ippolito, J. (2019) ‘Can Artificial Intelligence Make Art without Artists? Ask the Viewer’, Arts, 8(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010035.

Bartlett, B., Estivill-Castro, V. and Seymon, S. (2004) ‘Dogs or Robots: Why do Children see them as Robotic Pets rather than Canine Machines?’ Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vladimir-Estivill-Castro/publication/234818367_Dogs_or_
Robots_Why_do_Children_see_them_as_Robotic_Pets_rather_than_Canine_Machines/links/02e7e5253cb4b00bf9000000/Dogs-or-Robots-Why-do-Children-see-them-as-Robotic-Pets-rather-than-Canine-Machines.pdf.

Can’t Help Myself | The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation (no date) The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation. Available at: https://www.guggenheim.org/artwork/34812.

Catts, O. and Zurr, I. (2002) ‘Growing Semi-Living Sculptures: The Tissue Culture  Art Project’, Leonardo, 35(4), pp. 365–370. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/002409402760181123.

Caudwell, C.B. (no date) ‘Into the Furby-Verse: The Narrative Production of Electronic Companions’. Available at: https://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10063/8709/thesis.pdf?sequence=3.

Chai, F., Peng, K. and Yu, F. (no date) ‘Pricing Aesthetics: How Cognitive Perception Affects Bidding for Artworks’. Scientific Journal Publishers. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.4.541.

Coeckelbergh, M. (2017) ‘Can Machines Create Art?’, Philosophy & Technology, 30(3), pp. 285–303. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0231-5.

Cooney, M. (2021) ‘Robot Art, in the Eye of the Beholder?: Personalized Metaphors Facilitate Communication of Emotions and Creativity’, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2021.668986.

designboom, piotr boruslawski I. (no date) ‘artificially intelligent robot musio, learns and adapts with you’. Available at: https://www.designboom.com/technology/aka-musio-06-01-2015/.

Escalante, A. (no date) ‘Scientists Confirm That Your Roomba DOES Have A Personality’. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisonescalante/2020/05/15/scientists-confirm-roomba-personality/.

Exhibitions — Ai-Da (no date) Ai-Da. Available at: https://www.ai-darobot.com/exhibitions.

Farnsworth, P.R. and Misumi, I. (1931) ‘Further Data on Suggestion in Pictures’, The American Journal of Psychology, 43(4), p. 632. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1415168.

Fortuna, P. and Modliński, A. (2021) ‘A(I)rtist or Counterfeiter? Artificial Intelligence as (D)Evaluating Factor on the Art Market’, The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society[Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2021.1887032.

Frąckiewicz, M. (no date) ‘AI in Robotic Art Installations’. Available at: https://ts2.space/en/ai-in-robotic-art-installations/.

Graham, R.F. (no date) ‘Hitchhiking robot is found destroyed in Philly’. Available at: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3183126/Friendly-hitchhiking-robot-beaten-pulp-Philly-two-weeks-attempt-cross-country.html.

Harle, R. (2018) ‘Patrick Tresset: Human Traits and the Art of Creative Machines’, Leonardo, 51(5), pp. 537–538. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_r_01676.

Hawley-Dolan, A. and Winner, E. (2011) ‘Seeing the Mind Behind the Art’, Psychological Science [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611400915.

Hawley-Dolan, A. and Young, L. (2013) ‘Whose Mind Matters More—The Agent or the Artist? An Investigation of Ethical and Aesthetic Evaluations’, PLoS ONE, 8(9), p. e70759. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070759.

hitchBOT – Wikipedia (no date). Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HitchBOT.

Infinite Reality | Guide books (no date) Guide books. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/2018630.

Is artificial intelligence set to become art’s next medium? | Christie’s (no date). Available at: https://www.christies.com/features/A-collaboration-between-two-artists-one-human-one-a-machine-9332-1.aspx.

Magazine, S. and Raemont, N. (no date) ‘Who Is the Woman Haunting A.I.-Generated Art?’ Available at: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/loab-artificial-intelligence-art-180980743/.

McCormack, J. and d’Inverno, M. (2012) ‘Computers and Creativity: The Road Ahead’. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Available at: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-31727-9_16.pdf.

Nast, C. (no date) ‘Hitchhiking robot that relied on human kindness found decapitated’. Available at: https://www.wired.co.uk/article/hitchbot-usa-vandalised-philadelphia.

O’Rourke, A. (no date) ‘Caring about virtual perts: an ethical interpretation of Tamagotchi’. Available at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/ai/vol2/iss1/1.

Orwell, G. (2004) Nineteen Eighty-Four. Penguin Classics. Available at: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7359256M/Nineteen_Eighty-Four.

Robbie Barrat – Artist Profile (Photos, Videos, Exhibitions) — AIArtists.org (no date) AIArtists.org. Available at: https://aiartists.org/robbie-barrat.

Roombas fill an emotional vacuum for owners (no date) NBC News. Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna21102202.

Six Robots Named Paul — Illuminate Productions (no date) Illuminate Productions. Available at: https://www.illuminateproductions.co.uk/six-robots-named-paul.

Sophia the Robot and Hanson Robotics Prepares for new NFT Drop on July 19, 2021, “Reflections on the Uncanny” – Hanson Robotics (no date) Hanson Robotics. Available at: https://www.hansonrobotics.com/press_release/sophia-the-robot-and-hanson-robotics-prepares-for-new-nft-drop-on-july-19-2021-reflections-on-the-uncanny/.

Sun Yuan and Peng Yu: Can’t Help Myself (no date) YouTube. Available at: https://youtu.be/ZS4Bpr2BgnE.

The Artistic Side of Artificial Intelligence (no date) Psychology Today. Available at: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-digital-self/201703/the-artistic-side-artificial-intelligence.

The Latest Artist Selling NFTs? It’s a Robot. (Published 2021) (no date). Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/25/arts/sophia-robot-nft.html.

‘The_Media_Equation_How_People_Treat_Comp20161127-17472-1s43e41-libre.pdf’ (no date). Available at: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/50585912/The_Media_Equation_How_People_Treat_Comp20161127-17472-1s43e41-libre.pdf?1480319816=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DThe_media_equation_How_people_treat_comp.pdf&Expires=1685219506&Signature=
IDCIGdD9uWVaYhRV1~Ip0BeLU28Pq21sgGZECfYcPQtdwQoCLHd78hUUmzKKgOeZ~VNLemqx0hzp5MWSvsfaNMjn
TTO6wWNna9SoZcZR4D8ZOV~JyRjyOzXrF4W~
YFgsqklvgY4g0jFNzvXqeOe2zMjRFncjsgo25SOtI3jfEXcAPcy8g0GSUAawW7jqEccWi~5s45saQTzfvmI5z4HaWybs-s4DBpAb6edk3Uo1HnnspHdJIuYercUULbQ6NP7tLFDO4efqTnb5VrY6z3K0jN9LJ~CoMRXM5QEwAc~aT6DBX-oKbseGHLkYDa~GS5u39q4r7kRGXezufif2Ho5V2Q__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA.

Walsh, T. (2022) Machines Behaving Badly – The Morality of AI. History Press Limited, The. Available at: https://openlibrary.org/books/OL36269628M/Machines_Behaving_Badly.

Additional Information

Background information to the research paper proposal

Please see my Study Statement and also my Research Journey (to date) for additional context on the research paper proposal.  Hopefully this will provide some background to the project and why I have chosen to study humanoid robotic generated art versus simple algorithmic text to image generated art.

In my Study Statement I proposed that I wanted to test both the feasibility and design of a new kind of hybrid human, digital and ai generated art form.  During my initial research I discovered that there was a degree of negative bias surrounding text to image Ai generated art.  Therefore, if any new kind of human, digital and Ai hybrid art form is to be successful, it warrants further investigation into some of the issues surrounding it.  My paper will be an attempt to understand if there is a way of mitigating negative bias towards Ai generated art using empathetic humanoid robots.  I propose to measure the success of empathetic humanoid robots using a comparative study of humanoid robots versus simple text to image Ai art generation.

please see:

• Study Statement
• Research Journey (to date)